Hindenburg Research Backs Twitter in Elon Musk Lawsuit

The fight is set: Elon Musk has bowed out of his $44 billion Twitter takeover, and, in response, the social media company is taking the world’s richest man to court (the Delaware Court of Chancery, in particular). One bet-maker, the…

Jennifer
Image Credit: iStock, chinnapong
Sign up for insightful business news.

The fight is set: Elon Musk has bowed out of his $44 billion Twitter takeover, and, in response, the social media company is taking the world’s richest man to court (the Delaware Court of Chancery, in particular).

One bet-maker, the famed short-selling firm Hindenburg Research, has pegged Twitter as the favorite in the legal bout. Markets are already moving.

The Long and Short of It

Hindenburg on Wednesday revealed “a significant long position in shares of Twitter” with, what else, a Tweet. The firm’s blunt, character-limited message warned the social media company’s “complaint poses a credible threat to Musk’s empire.” Hindenburg founder Nate Anderson told the Financial Times that Musk “squandered much of his leverage, largely through misadvised and compulsive tweets,” and dismissed his pretext for terminating the deal — that Twitter has too many bot accounts.

Ironically, Anderson was in the Tesla CEO’s corner as recently as May, when his firm closed a short position on Twitter and said Musk held “all the cards” to reprice the deal from $54.20 per share down to around $48. Hindenberg’s sudden about-face adds to a history of feisty agitation, meticulous muckraking, and high-stakes short-selling:

  • Last year, amid the wild SPAC boom, Hindenburg established short positions in DraftKings and electric-vehicle makers Lordstown Motors and Nikola. Nikola’s founder has since been charged with securities fraud, Lordstown’s CEO resigned amid an SEC investigation alleging the company misled investors, and DraftKing’s stock has plummeted over 80% since Hindenburg alleged the sports gambling firm has ties to the black market.
  • “There are just so many outrageous companies,” Anderson, who first made a splash identifying a $1 billion fraud case perpetrated by the hedge fund Platinum Partners, told The New York Times last year. “Some of these companies we have looked at, they don’t have any revenues at all.”

Twitter’s stock jumped around 8% Wednesday after Hindenburg’s vote of confidence. Suffice to say for Musk and Twitter, the firm has a knack for spotting winners — and losers — when it sees them.

Analysis more

Extra Credit: The Shifting World of Private Credit Markets

Tale of the Tape: Warren Buffett and Cathie Wood

Recent News

Slack CEO Will Step Down in January

Tesla Denies Claims It Will Make Fewer Model Ys in China

Glencore to pay $180 Million to Democratic Republic of Congo

Delta Proposes More than 30% Pay Increases in New Pilot Contract

[subscribe-form listid="1ebbb697aaa44fb1971fe0a3c42ff841" source="organic" medium="organic" redirect-url=""]
<form action="" class="subscribe-form "> <input type="text" name="subscribe_form_email" placeholder="Enter your email"> <input type="text" name="subscribe_form_name" placeholder="Enter your name" value="" class="c-subscribe-from_field"> <button class="c-btn" id="subscribe-form-submit" type="submit">Subscribe</button> <div class="subscribe-form-message"></div> <div class="subscribe-form-vars"> <input type="hidden" class="subscribe-form-param" name="params[listid]" value="1ebbb697aaa44fb1971fe0a3c42ff841"> <input type="hidden" class="subscribe-form-param" name="params[source]" value="organic"> <input type="hidden" class="subscribe-form-param" name="params[medium]" value="organic"> <input type="hidden" class="subscribe-form-param" name="params[redirect_url]" value=""> </div> </form>