Good morning.
The White House announced on Monday a bumper crop of aid, $12 billion, for American farmers beset by cost increases and agricultural disputes arising from Washington’s trade wars.
Farmers who raise cattle and grow row crops (corn, cotton, rice, potatoes, etc.) will get direct payments by the end of February, with the amount they can apply for still to be finalized. The hardest hit this year were soybean and sorghum farmers, whose top export market, China, has jousted with the US in a tit-for-tat struggle. In October, both sides agreed to roll back some measures, and China pledged to ramp up soybean purchases, which had halted. American farmers reaped what tariffs sowed, but now they’ll have billions to show for it.
Paramount Refuses to Take ‘No’ for an Answer on Warner Bros. Takeover Bid
Just when Warner Bros. Discovery and Netflix were picking out china patterns for their $82.7 billion elopement, spurned suitor David Ellison kicked down the church doors shouting, “I object!”
On Monday, Ellison’s Paramount SkyDance made a hostile takeover bid for WBD, claiming its all-cash offer “provides shareholders $18 billion more in cash than the Netflix consideration.” And crucially, Ellison’s new entertainment company said its deal would face significantly less antitrust scrutiny.
The Big Picture
As Hollywood itself has warned us in countless plotlines: Be careful what you wish for. To coerce WBD into a sale, Paramount submitted an initial, unsolicited bid in October valued at around $20 per share, according to Reuters sources. Instead, the aggressive move kicked off a bidding war, and now Paramount is throwing a Hail Mary at $30 per share.
The straight-to-shareholders pitch rests in part on the argument that a Paramount takeover is more appealing to an audience in Washington, DC. Netflix leads the subscription streaming market with more than 300 million subscribers, while WBD’s HBO Max sits behind Amazon and Disney’s offerings with around 130 million subscribers, and Paramount+ has around 79 million subscribers. Paramount is arguing that Netflix would unfairly control the streaming market with WBD in tow, a sentiment seemingly shared by President Trump.
For now, WBD and Netflix are expected to say their deal should pass antitrust muster, if only everyone looks at the bigger picture:
- Netflix is expected to argue that the market-share point is overstated, given that 75% of HBO Max’s 130 million subscribers already subscribe to Netflix, according to reporting from Bloomberg. Co-CEO Ted Sarandos on Monday also promised that Warner Bros. TV will continue to produce and sell shows to rival distributors, something Netflix has never done.
- The company may also argue that its WBD acquisition wouldn’t make it the dominant player in the streaming market but rather a better competitor in a much larger market currently led by YouTube. Per Nielsen, YouTube accounted for nearly 13% of all streaming engagement in October, compared with 8% for Netflix, 2.1% for Paramount and 1.3% for WBD.
History Lesson: For longtime Warner Bros veterans, the saga must feel as familiar as the story beats in the umpteenth Batman reboot. Way back in 2000, the company known as Time Warner sold itself to AOL for $180 billion — a deal that started with the threat of a hostile takeover by AOL. Even the presidential concerns are familiar. In 2019, during Trump 1.0, POTUS ordered his Department of Justice to oppose AT&T’s acquisition of the company then known as Time Warner … only for the DOJ to lose its case in federal court. The lesson here? Should Ellison fail today, just wait. Another shot will come.
Your Playbook for the Next Era of ETFs
The ETF world is shifting, from active strategies to new themes and sectors rising fast.
That’s why we built ETF Upside, the resource that breaks down the trends shaping the future of exchange-traded funds.
Every Monday and Wednesday, ETF Upside delivers timely insights and actionable takeaways to help you make smarter investment decisions, whether you’re an individual investor, an advisor, or part of an institutional team.
Investors Throw Side-Eye at Tesla’s Optimus-tic $1.4T Market Cap

Tesla’s humanoid robot took a suspicious tumble while handing out bottled water during a demo in Miami over the weekend. It’s sus because the Optimus bot appeared to some X users to take off a nonexistent headset before falling, prompting concerns that it was being controlled by a remote human operator rather than AI alone.
Whether a human is pulling the robots’ strings or not, it’s a bad look for Tesla at a time when investors are doubting its future.
Tapping the Brakes
Morgan Stanley cut its rating of Tesla on Monday to “equal weight,” which is equivalent to a hold. It’s the first time the bank has downgraded Tesla in more than two years, and the company’s shares fell a few percent yesterday as traders digested the evaluation. On Friday, the stock was within 5% of its all-time closing high.
Investors still have high hopes for Tesla, with Morgan Stanley targeting a $425 share price, still up for the year. But concerns have risen that the stock may be overvalued. Tesla’s the second-most expensive company in the S&P 500, behind Warner Bros. Discovery, with its shares trading at 210 times the company’s projected earnings.
Specifically, analysts aren’t certain Tesla’s immediate future will rev up profits:
- Morgan Stanley’s key concern is flagging EV sales: The bank expects Tesla’s North American sales to drop 12% next year. Tesla’s revenue was boosted in the fall quarter by consumers rushing to buy cars before EV tax incentives expired, but before that, it had two straight quarters of declines. Morgan Stanley sees the dip as industry-wide: The bank also slashed its ratings for smaller rivals Lucid and Rivian, citing tariff concerns and the disappearing EV tax credits.
- Tesla has pushed a narrative of its next chapter that goes far beyond Cybertrucks, and much of the company’s stock climb has been ascribed to its futuristic aspirations. Morgan Stanley thinks its humanoid robots are worth $60 per share, even if they’re still struggling with liquid refreshment.
Driver’s Seat: Tesla’s share price has, in part, hinged on investors having faith in its visionary founder. Shares dipped this year amid concerns that Musk was spending too much time on other projects, such as the Department of Government Efficiency. Critics also thought his political antics would put off would-be Tesla buyers (cue anti-Musk bumper stickers). Now that the DOGE experiment is over, the world waits to see which shiny object captures Musk’s gaze next. Jupiter? A cage match with Sam Altman? Or, dare we dream, the actual car company that made him rich?

Actively Trading Stocks and ETFs? You could be missing out on the unique benefits that only futures can offer. Trade 23 hours a day and act on market volatility whenever it happens with futures on the S&P 500, Nasdaq 100, gold, bitcoin and more. Start right now.
JPMorgan Hires Vaunted Berkshire Stockpicker as Buffett’s Exit Spurs C-Suite Shakeup
Berkshire Hathaway’s C-suite is undergoing a makeover as CEO Warren Buffett’s hand-picked successor, Greg Abel, prepares to take over the top job. One of the big winners is an executive who doesn’t even work in their building.
That would be Jamie Dimon. On Monday, the JPMorgan Chase CEO celebrated the hiring of Todd Combs, the Berkshire stock-picking wizard who helmed the turnaround of its Geico car insurance subsidiary. “JPMorgan, as usually is the case, has made a good decision,” Buffett noted.
Dining on Buffett’s Dimon
Buffett plans to retire at the end of this year following a six-decade run as arguably Wall Street’s sagest and most admired investor, doing it all from his perch 1,100 miles away in Omaha (you can’t fulfill your Runza cravings in Lower Manhattan, after all). Abel, who runs Berkshire’s energy subsidiary and non-insurance operations, is expected to surround himself with some new faces.
On Monday, Berkshire announced that CFO Marc Hamburg, who has held the role for 40 years, plans to retire in June, when he’ll be succeeded by Charles Chang, Abel’s CFO at Berkshire Energy. And Adam Johnson, the CEO of Berkshire’s private business jet subsidiary, NetJets, has been bumped up to leading the conglomerate’s consumer products and retail business, which includes Dairy Queen and Duracell batteries.
Neither move was a surprise. What did turn heads was the unexpected departure of Combs. Buffett hired him in 2010 when he was a relatively obscure if talented hedge fund manager, and the rest is history or, er, equity. Among his best bets was a massive stake in Apple that has proven highly lucrative. Markets registered their verdict:
- Berkshire shares fell 1.4% on Monday. Dimon, meanwhile, celebrated the arrival of “one of the greatest investors and leaders I’ve known.”
- At JPMorgan, Combs will be in charge of a $10 billion strategic-investment group at the bank’s “Security and Resiliency Initiative,” which seeks to drum up some $1.5 trillion for US innovation and manufacturing. He has been a director at the bank since 2016 and is stepping down to take the new job.
The Next Move: Nancy Pierce, Geico’s COO, will take over from Combs, but who will fill his shoes in the investment department is unclear. Such challenges will test whether future CEO Greg is ready and Abel.
Extra Upside
- What Tariffs? China’s annual trade surplus hit $1 trillion for the first time, passing the milestone in the first 11 months of the year, a 22% increase over the same period last year.
- In at the Buzzer: Medical supplies company Mediline is seeking to raise up to $5.4 billion at a $55 billion valuation in what’s poised to be the biggest initial public offering of 2025.
- Unlock Startup Funding From Your Biggest Supporters. Members of your network are eager to invest with you, but they lack liquid cash. Alto fixes that by letting them use retirement savings through self-directed IRAs, giving your investors a deeper pool of capital to put to work in your raise. See how it works.*
* Partner

