Move over, Wall Street: Alternative assets managers are coming for Main Street investors.

Two of the world’s largest managers just won approval to launch public-private credit funds, investments that were once the playground of the richest investors. Capital Group and KKR got the greenlight from the Securities and Exchange Commission to launch two new credit interval funds that use both public debt and private credit inside a single product. The new funds specifically target retail investors, a segment that could turn into a lucrative, untapped marketplace for the industry and are designed to be used by financial advisors and their clients.

“Private assets are usually for high-net-worth investors, so it has this air of exclusivity to it — which sort of implies that it’s better — and that’s sort of the same with credit,” said Morningstar research analyst Daniel Sotiroff, adding that some advisors have expressed general concerns about a lack of transparency, liquidity, and higher fees. “On the surface, you’re just getting access to loans.”

It’s a Private Affair

For Cap Group, the credit will be packaged inside interval funds, which are closed-end funds that typically offer liquidity to investors quarterly, not daily, like mutual funds or ETFs. The Capital Group KKR Core Plus+ and Capital Group KKR Multi-Sector+ funds will have a split of 60% publicly traded debt and 40% private credit. They’ll also offer:

• Redemptions of as much as 10% of the fund’s net asset value quarterly, according to a report from Bloomberg.
• The funds will be managed jointly by both firms, and valuations of the funds will be provided daily.

The products are just the latest example of the industry rushing to push private investment products into Main Street portfolios. State Street and Apollo got the so-called “first-mover” advantage last month by landing approval from the SEC to launch an exchange-traded fund that surprised many analysts (inflows are also surprisingly lean). And just last week, Vanguard and Wellington Management teamed up with Blackstone to offer similar products; details are forthcoming.

“Hopefully, initiatives like this will someday even reach the ETF listing arena,” said Ben Fulton, CEO of WEBs Investments. “I’m always an advocate for new, innovative ideas that help investors access hard-to-reach investment solutions.”

The Feeling’s Mutual. While there’s a ton of buzz around private-public investing, mutual funds have been doing it for years, according to Morningstar. The outcomes, however, haven’t been exactly “encouraging.” The firm’s research found that the mutual funds it analyzed would have been better off actually taking those private stakes and investing them in the public markets over the last decade. “What we’ve seen, in the limited sample that we have access to, is not impressive,” Sotiroff said. “The question becomes: Is this legitimately good for investors at the end of the day?”

If possession were actually nine-tenths of the law, that would be a big issue for custodying crypto assets, an area that already has enough problems.

During its latest crypto roundtable last Friday, the SEC questioned broker-dealers on whether physical possession and control of assets is the right standard for custody. By all accounts, the space needs clarity to account for the differences between crypto and more traditional assets. There was no shortage of finger-pointing at the prior Securities and Exchange Commission for being slow to act on crypto. Commissioner Hester Peirce, who heads the agency’s new crypto task force, said that companies are playing “the floor is lava” but with the extra obstacle of the lights being off.

“To engage in crypto-related activities, SEC registrants have had to hop from one poorly illuminated regulatory space to the next, all while ensuring that they never touch any crypto asset,” Peirce said at the roundtable. “A broker or [alternative trading system] that cannot custody or otherwise handle an asset will find it difficult to facilitate trading in the asset, and a robust market is unlikely to develop.”

Getting a Handle on Crypto

In one of his first public appearances as SEC chairman, Paul Atkins made clear that he wants the regulator to provide clarity to “long-festering issues, such as regulatory treatment of digital assets and distributed ledger technologies.” That could mean changes to custody rules under the Exchange Act, Advisers Act, or Investment Company Act, he noted. So-called “special purpose broker dealers” can custody crypto assets, under guidance from the SEC and FINRA, but only a couple of firms have obtained approval to do so. Further, there are questions of whether investment advisors should be able to self-custody digital assets and what happens when crypto assets are or aren’t securities.

Commissioner Caroline Crenshaw, the lone Democrat at the head of the SEC, cited concerns about risks to consumer protections in changing custody rules on either the broker-dealer or investment advisor side. For investment advisers, she raised several questions, including:

• What are the risks of self-custody generally, and is that heightened with crypto?
• Would an exemption from the custody rule for crypto invite fraud?
• Are most investment advisers capable of safe self-custody of crypto?

Advice from a Crypto Exchange. The best way to custody crypto is to keep it from moving around, said Mark Greenberg, Kraken’s vice president of consumer business and product. “Crypto assets are best held at rest,” he said, of storing them in fewer locations. Having crypto segregated into many small wallets means having to move it more often, so “the more likely it is to get stolen,” he said.

You can’t win ‘em all.

Wall Street may have had a stellar first quarter, but not everyone in wealth management was riding high, with two of the most well-known independent broker-dealers reporting a mixed bag. While the earnings period for both Ameriprise and Raymond James ended just before the Trump administration enacted its new tariff policies that have simultaneously rocked equity and bond markets, the anticipation of aggressive trade tactics and the volatility surrounding them were enough to deliver a blow to their earnings.

Read more.